Legalizing marijuana could bring in $2 billion for Washington

SEATTLE (AP) - The state's latest financial analysis says legalizing and taxing marijuana could bring Washington as much as nearly $2 billion over the next five years — or as little as nothing.
The Office of Financial Management released its fiscal impact statement for Initiative 502 on Friday, and the results track closely with its earlier analysis, released in March.
I-502, which will be on the November ballot, would legalize pot under state law and allow its sale at state-licensed stores, with tax proceeds dedicated to education, health care and substance abuse prevention. Oregon and Colorado voters will also decide on marijuana legalization measures this fall.
Marijuana would remain illegal under federal law, however, and it isn't clear how the federal government would respond if any of the states voted to legalize it. The Justice Department could prosecute employees of state-licensed pot shops, sue in federal court to block the laws from taking effect, or simply seize the tax revenue from the states as proceeds of transactions that are illegal under federal law.
Because the federal response remains unclear, Washington's analysts said they could not determine the ultimate effect of I-502 on the state's finances. However, they said, assuming a fully functioning marijuana market develops — and that it entirely replaces the existing illicit market — state revenue from pot sales could be more than $1.9 billion over the next five years. The state typically spends $30 billion per two-year budget cycle.
I-502 would create a system of state-licensed growers, processors and stores, and impose a 25 percent tax at each stage. People 21 and older could buy up to an ounce of dried marijuana, one pound of marijuana-infused product in solid form, such as brownies, or 72 ounces of marijuana-infused liquids.
The analysis anticipates 100 state-licensed growers supplying 328 marijuana stores that would sell more than 187,000 pounds to at least 363,000 customers. Those numbers are based on federal drug-use surveys.
Consumers would pay $12 per gram — the price currently charged by many medical marijuana dispensaries — plus the 25 percent marijuana tax, 10 percent state sales tax, and any local sales tax, the analysts assumed.
The document noted that Washington would likely lose some federal money to fight drugs, such as a marijuana eradication grant from the Drug Enforcement Administration.
However, the analysis did not take into account any possible savings from no longer arresting, prosecuting and jailing people for having small amounts of marijuana, and Alison Holcomb, campaign manager for I-502, said she found that disappointing.
About 10,000 people in Washington are charged with misdemeanor marijuana possession each year.
___
Johnson can be reached at https://twitter.com/GeneAPseattle
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.
Why would ending possession arrests save money when the money used on those gets shifted to other cannabis crimes?  Right now, the largest age group that is arrested for possession is ages 15-19 and 502 keeps penalties in place, in fact makes them harsher.  502 will prioritize funds to other areas of cannabis crimes.  Please don't make it even harder on our kids and our medical cannabis patients in this state.  Vote NO on 502.  It's just a new approach to reefer madness."As my law-enforcement colleagues know well from chasing bootleggers and mobsters, this new regulatory and criminal approach will still require many years of intensive investigation and enforcement before organized criminal elements are driven from the vast marijuana market. DEA and its law-enforcement partners must therefore remain well equipped and staffed to accomplish this task: to protect our families from truly dangerous drugs and to drive drug cartels, gangs and dope dealers from our society."  -John McKay  (Seattle University law professor,  former United States attorney in Seattle, key spokesperson for I-502)Â
What they aren't telling you is the associated costs of making those chronically ill cannabis patients homebound. Ask any social worker to run the numbers, but I was an RN in home health for years, and if this passes, there will be a whole bunch of newly homebound patients, and that cost will have medical costs for them go through the roof. Most of these people live well under the poverty level and social programs have been cut to the bone already.
Â
By passing this "per se" DUI law, which is based on numbers that the studies say are not valid for measuring impairment, it will mean cannabis patients are no longer legal to drive, as most ingest their medicine. Medication can be titrated for toleration of side effects, and this means that for many those numbers don't mean a thing except an automatic conviction of guilt.
Â
We do not have the resources to take care of all the people who would be dependent now on public transportation, people who are not even necessarily impaired, but who will be rendered homebound.
Â
And if that is not enough, look up the statistics for mortality in the newly homebound. It's not pretty.
Â
Vote NO on I-502!